whether they can get points when you win the first instance 2nd place or 3rd place place for example not to be in 5 level to be 350 points rather than for example the 450th What do you think?
Uhhhhhh....*looks over confusingly*
I don't think its a good idea
i didn't understand a word of that. can u use better gramma and punctuation?
I think what he's trying to say is that he thinks that we should get points for getting medals (#1#2#3) and lose them when we lose the medal.
Say Randy gets a #1 medal. He gets points for it. Then Storm comes along and takes the first place medal and Randy is second place. Randy would lose a third of the points he got.
I have though about doing a similar concept, but it doesn't really work.
This is my plan for the future:
High score games will be kinda like achievements. For example '1 point for scoring 5,000' '2 points for scoring 10,000' and '3 points for scoring 20,000'
Thats iteresting, but it depends on the game really.
ok, I get it now, but it needs some adjustments